I said in a previous post how I haven’t really been able to explain why I made the change from computer science to architecture at the end of my first year at university. I figured it’s about time to put it down on paper, since it might be easier to explain.
Until I actually made the change, I had shown no interest (openly) in the world of architecture. However, I think inside, I have always been curious about building design and construction. As a kid I remember getting my first Lego set; I must have been about 3 years old, and from that age till I turned 10,
Lego was my favourite pastime. I could sit there for hours on end coming up with crazy designs for buildings and vehicles. I think this early creative streak kinda embedded itself and has never really gone away.
Then there is the question of my so-called expensive taste. My mom is always quick to point it out to me. According to her, everything I own and everything on my wish list has a hefty price tag (my lovely
PowerBook included;-). The way I see it, yes some of my possessions are expensive items, but that’s only because somebody has taken the time to design them well and then make sure they work like they should. The fact that form is more important to me than function makes me wonder why I didn’t choose architecture (or something similar) in the first place. This is not to say that function should be ignored; in-fact the two are complementary, one does not work without the other. But my point is that design and the way things look have always come first.
This became more evident when we moved house about 5 years ago. We had actually bought the house a year earlier and stripped it down to just four walls and started over. Now at the time I was still in high school, so I didn’t really have a say in what went into the new house. I wanted to get stuck in and contribute in a major way. It annoyed me slightly since all I could do was sit back and watch my folks make decisions about the look and layout of the house. It is now apparent that some of these choices made (I won’t go into them) in the early stages of the renovation were bad ones and this infuriated me greatly. So anyway this was just another push towards my chosen area of study.
This doesn’t explain how I ended up choosing computer science ahead of architecture. To understand this I think you have to look at the workings of a typical Indian family. Its quite simple really; there is a level of expectation within the family. Obviously they want you to be successful in life (what family wouldn’t?), but there is a group of about 5-6 careers from which Asian students are expected to choose from. This isn’t an official thing, but choosing something outside this list will result in major disappointment, especially amongst the older family members (although they won’t say it). In my previous post I explained, how at the time, computer science seemed like the perfect choice, and with a hint of persuasion from my family I genuinely believed it was. A year on, I realised that it wasn’t for me and in the back of my mind I was craving for something a bit more creative.
This is where architecture comes into the equation. Here I get to use the other side of my brain (the side that has been lying dormant since the end of my Lego playing days), and it gives me the chance not only to be creative and expressive, but also allows me to have fun. I am a strong believer in enjoying your work, as you are more likely to be successful at it. In a way, studying architecture has allowed me to go back and play with my Lego set. It’s just like being a kid again ☺.